The Shadow AI Crisis: Why 40% of Organizations Will Face Security Incidents by 2030
Dec 1, 2025
Gartner's latest prediction is sobering. By 2030, more than 40% of global organizations will suffer security and compliance incidents due to unauthorized AI tool usage. The research points to a problem that is already widespread: 69% of cybersecurity leaders have evidence or suspect employees are using public generative AI at work, despite the risks.
This isn't speculative. The consequences are real and already happening.
The Scope of Shadow AI
Shadow AI refers to the use of AI tools outside official IT governance and security controls. Unlike traditional shadow IT, where employees might use unsanctioned SaaS applications, shadow AI carries unique risks that many organizations haven't fully grasped.
The statistics paint a clear picture:
69% of cybersecurity leaders suspect or have confirmed public GenAI usage at work
Over a third of organizations in the US, UK, Germany, the Nordics and Benelux struggle to monitor unauthorized AI use
A fifth of UK firms have had potentially sensitive corporate data exposed via employee GenAI usage
27% of employees admit to using non-sanctioned AI tools
The Samsung case from 2023 illustrates the risk clearly. Staff shared source code and meeting notes with ChatGPT, forcing the company to ban GenAI internally. When employees paste proprietary code, customer data, or strategic plans into public AI tools, that information becomes training data. It can resurface in responses to other users, creating data leakage that is nearly impossible to track or remediate.
Why Shadow AI Creates Unique Security Challenges
Shadow AI differs from traditional shadow IT in three critical ways:
Data exposure is immediate and permanent. When an employee uploads source code to ChatGPT, that code is now outside the organization's control. There's no firewall log, no data loss prevention alert, no audit trail. The data is simply gone, potentially forever.
The barrier to entry is zero. Employees don't need technical skills or special access. Anyone can open a browser tab and start pasting sensitive information into public AI tools. The friction is so low that usage spreads organically before security teams can respond.
Detection is nearly impossible. Traditional network monitoring can't see HTTPS traffic to AI services. Endpoint agents can't differentiate between legitimate research and data exfiltration when both happen in a browser. The activity looks like normal web browsing.
The Hidden Cost: Technical Debt and Lock-In
Gartner warns that the problems extend beyond immediate security incidents. By 2030, 50% of enterprises will face delayed AI upgrades and rising maintenance costs due to unmanaged technical debt from GenAI usage.
AI-generated code, content, and designs require ongoing maintenance. Without clear standards for reviewing and documenting AI-generated assets, organizations accumulate fragile, poorly understood systems. When it's time to upgrade or replace these components, the cost and complexity can be prohibitive.
There's also the risk of ecosystem lock-in. As organizations become dependent on specific AI platforms and vendors, switching costs grow. Skills atrophy as teams rely on AI assistance rather than developing deep expertise. The organization loses institutional knowledge, making it vulnerable to vendor changes, price increases, or service discontinuation.
What Organizations Should Do Now
Gartner's recommendations are clear and actionable:
Define clear enterprise-wide policies for AI tool usage. These policies should specify which AI tools are approved, what data can be shared with them, and what approval process is required for new tools. But policies alone aren't enough if you can't enforce them.
Conduct regular audits for shadow AI activity. This means actively searching for unauthorized AI usage, not just waiting for incidents. The challenge is that traditional audit methods don't work when the activity happens in browser tabs and personal accounts.
Incorporate GenAI risk evaluation into SaaS assessment processes. Every new AI tool should be evaluated for data handling, security controls, and compliance before approval. But this assumes you know about the tools in the first place.
Beyond Gartner's recommendations, organizations need practical approaches that acknowledge the reality of how employees work:
Create safe alternatives. If employees are using public AI tools because internal options are limited or cumbersome, provide approved alternatives that meet their needs while protecting data.
Educate on real consequences. Employees often don't understand that pasting code into ChatGPT is equivalent to publishing it on a public forum. Show them what can happen to that data and why it matters.
Implement technical controls. This is where many organizations struggle. How do you prevent data exfiltration to AI services without blocking legitimate work? How do you monitor activity that happens in encrypted browser sessions?
The Role of AI Security Platforms
The scale and nature of shadow AI challenges require specialized approaches. Traditional security tools weren't designed for a world where employees can exfiltrate terabytes of data through a browser tab without triggering any alerts.
AI security platforms address this gap by providing the visibility and control that organizations need. They monitor AI tool usage across the environment, detect when sensitive data is being transmitted to unauthorized services, and enforce policies that prevent data leakage while allowing legitimate AI adoption.
For shadow AI specifically, these platforms can:
Identify which public AI services are being used and by whom
Detect when sensitive data is being transmitted to unauthorized AI tools
Block data exfiltration in real-time while providing safe alternatives
Audit AI tool usage for compliance and governance requirements
Moving Forward
The 40% prediction from Gartner isn't inevitable. Organizations that act now to understand and control their AI usage can significantly reduce their risk. But this requires acknowledging that shadow AI is already happening in your environment and that traditional security approaches won't detect it.
The question isn't whether employees are using unauthorized AI tools. The evidence says they are. The question is whether you'll discover it through a security incident or through proactive monitoring.
For organizations looking to stay ahead of this trend, the time to establish visibility and control over AI usage is now—before the incidents Gartner predicts become reality.
Experience the most advanced AI Safety Platform
Unified AI Safety: One Platform, Total Protection
Secure your AI across endpoints, networks, applications, and APIs with a single, comprehensive enterprise platform.





